On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 09:27:11PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
> * Greg Stein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> > On Wed, Aug 14, 2002 at 12:11:05PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>...
> > > If APR supported config.layout (easy enough to add), a layout
> > > could have:
> >
> > I would totally support adding such a notion, along with the
> > ${major_version} example that you provided.
>
> This is really easy to do - the debian packages were doing exactly that for
> a long time. I can resurrect that patch and apply it this evening if people
> think it's a positive step?
Yes. Go for it.
>...
> For sure. the layout stuff is defined as an autoconf macro, so svn would
> just need to sinclude apr_layout.m4 or whatever, and then call the macro.
> We would, I guess, update httpd so we just had one canonical
> APR_LAYOUT implementation.
Apache has a lot more variables than APR has. For example: htdocs, icons,
cgi... Does your system handle that?
Back to the pragmatic: if you have an apr-only layout handler... fine. If it
works for both, well cool.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
