At 02:06 PM 8/13/2002, Ryan Bloom wrote:
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
> >
> > Why are we waiting for Bill to come back? I thought the whole point of
> > OSS was that no one person was so important that we couldn't continue
> > without them?
>
> I'm not saying that Bill is "so important" just that I know that he's
> done quite a bit of investigating into this issue and might have
> some final ideas. That's all :)
Ok. I don't honestly think we will get a release out the door this week
anyway, but I also don't believe that Will has done a lot with the
licensing stuff. Most of that was Greg Stein, and AFAIK, we do have a
run-time versioing scheme already.
s/licensing/versioning/ ???
I think Jim was talking about time_t and some other peripheral issues.
I'd suggest we give everyone the weekend + monday to identify borked-
ness that 'aught' to be fixed prior to release.
Put it in STATUS where it belongs. When STATUS is empty of agreed
showstoppers, it's time to roll out +1
And IMHO, time isn't a showstopper. There may be a few fn names that
need a final 'polishing' to get them all consistent, but we are pretty darned
close to done with that.
Bill
