Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anything which does more than abstracting the pure OS but touches on an > instance of it I see as bad. And yes - if you draw the parallel to an > almost ridiclious extend; I do think exactly the same when I see > ./Configure picking things up such as my 'gdbm' in /usr/local/lib and run > into trouble when I run the binary on the diskless machine an hour later.
So you configured/built on one environment, then ran the binary on another environment? Maybe I'm missing something, but... why exactly did you expect this to work? :-)
