Karl Fogel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It's just been waiting on Mike Pilato (or someone) having enough time > to implement it now, that's all. No procedural holdups remain, > agreed. > > -Karl, speaking for Mike, who is perfectly capable of speaking for > himself, but it's me checking email right now, not Mike :-).
Heh, or maybe I shouldn't have spoken at all -- the Subversion issue that I was thinking of is, in fact, unassigned at the moment, and wasn't directly relevant anyway. Mike or Greg, do you remember exactly what spurred this whole discussion? I'm drawing a total blank at the moment, but if we know, then we know when we'll need this APR functionality by. -K
