Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > --On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 8:27 PM +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ >> * @param inputLen The length of the next message block >> */ >> APU_DECLARE(apr_status_t) apr_md5_update(apr_md5_ctx_t *context, >> - const unsigned char > > *input, > >> + const void *input, >> apr_size_t inputLen); >> /** > > > My hunch is that this breaks binary compatibility. Do we need to > bump a version number or do some magic to make our binary compat > people happy? -- justin > It shouldn't. It could only break binary compatibility on systems where the representation and/or size of a void* is different than the representation of a char*, and I bet APR doesn't work on such systems.
-- Brane Äibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
