Branko Äibej wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Tuesday, January 21, 2003 8:27 PM +0000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
* @param inputLen The length of the next message block
*/
APU_DECLARE(apr_status_t) apr_md5_update(apr_md5_ctx_t *context,
- const unsigned char
*input,
+ const void *input,
apr_size_t inputLen);
/**
My hunch is that this breaks binary compatibility. Do we need to
bump a version number or do some magic to make our binary compat
people happy? -- justin
It shouldn't. It could only break binary compatibility on systems where
the representation and/or size of a void* is different than the
representation of a char*, and I bet APR doesn't work on such systems.
The representation is not _allowed_ to be different.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
