* Branko ??ibej ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > > --On Tuesday, February 4, 2003 2:09 PM +0000 Thom May > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> builds/rules.mk is installed so that's not a problem. > > > > > > Um, no. It's not. > > > > httpd happens to install *its* rules.mk. But, APR doesn't. -- justin > > > Which means this change is wrong, right? Looks like apr-util's buildconf > will bave to copy rules.mk.in after all, and configure will have to > convert it to rules.mk. > nah, just making apr install its rules.mk (as apr_rules.mk) atm. -Thom
- RE: apr-util buildconf copying rules.mk from ../apr Sander Striker
- Re: apr-util buildconf copying rules.mk from ../apr Garrett Rooney
- Re: apr-util buildconf copying rules.mk from ..... Jeff Trawick
- Re: apr-util buildconf copying rules.mk from ../apr Jeff Trawick
- Re: apr-util buildconf copying rules.mk from ..... Thom May
- RE: apr-util buildconf copying rules.mk fro... Sander Striker
- Re: apr-util buildconf copying rules.mk fro... Garrett Rooney
- Re: apr-util buildconf copying rules.mk... Thom May
- Re: apr-util buildconf copying rul... Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: apr-util buildconf copying... Branko Äibej
- Re: apr-util buildconf copying... Thom May
- Re: apr-util buildconf copying rules.mk... Jeff Trawick
- Re: apr-util buildconf copying rul... Cliff Woolley
- Re: apr-util buildconf copying rules.mk fro... Jeff Trawick
