Further thought. Isn't the point of APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD so that the other_child functions can be safely removed from the platform implementation rather than having to define stub functions that only return APR_ENOTIMPL?
Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com >>> "Brad Nicholes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Monday, March 03, 2003 11:45:43 AM >>> The #if APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD was removed from around the declaration of the apr_proc_other_child_xxx() procedures in apr_thread_proc.h. Yet the function apr_proc_other_child_refresh() uses the structure apr_other_child_rec_t which has been #if'ed out using APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD. This causes a compiler error on platforms that do not implement OTHER_CHILD. We need to either put the #if back around the function declarations or define apr_other_child_rec_t for all platforms that don't implement OTHER_CHILD. Brad Nicholes Senior Software Engineer Novell, Inc., the leading provider of Net business solutions http://www.novell.com
