At 12:45 PM 3/3/2003, Brad Nicholes wrote: >The #if APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD was removed from around the declaration of >the apr_proc_other_child_xxx() procedures in apr_thread_proc.h. Yet the >function apr_proc_other_child_refresh() uses the structure >apr_other_child_rec_t which has been #if'ed out using >APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD. This causes a compiler error on platforms that do >not implement OTHER_CHILD. We need to either put the #if back around >the function declarations or define apr_other_child_rec_t for all >platforms that don't implement OTHER_CHILD.
No, we should expose apr_other_child_rec_t always, at least its typedef, see my other post. I'll make it so. Bill
