Brian Pane wrote:
Thanks. IMHO, a 4x increase in CPU usage for the worst case isn't a problem, as that's a 4x increase in an operation that's only a few percent of the total cycles anyway.
But since the 4x degradation in the worst case may be controversial, I'd like to have a vote first. I'm +1 for making this change in APR. Can a few other committers weigh in?
Thanks, Brian
At about how many headers is the performance benefits of this patch lost?
Bill
