[cross posted to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:54 PM
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, Sander Striker wrote: > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 4:05 PM > > > > > I still don't have SIGCHLD (should that be APR_SIGCHLD or > > > something?). But the apr_proc_fork() error is gone. > > > > Hmmm: > > > > include/arch/win32/apr_private.h:139:#define SIGCHLD 17 > > > > I guess some includes are off. > > No they aren't. Program shouldn't be incuding apr_private.h, so you can't > expect SIGCHLD to be defined. Either a public APR header file redefines > it to APR_SIGCHLD, or it is only meant to be used inside APR. I know. I was assuming that the public header where this happens wasn't being included. However, some more research shows that SIGCHLD doesn't appear anywhere in the public headers. I expected something in apr_signal.h, but nothing there. Sander
