"Sander Striker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > No they aren't. Program shouldn't be incuding apr_private.h, so you can't > > expect SIGCHLD to be defined. Either a public APR header file redefines > > it to APR_SIGCHLD, or it is only meant to be used inside APR. > > I know. I was assuming that the public header where this happens wasn't > being included. However, some more research shows that SIGCHLD doesn't > appear anywhere in the public headers. I expected something in apr_signal.h, > but nothing there.
Yeah, I expected the same (and found the same ... or lack of the same ... or something).
