> From: Branko Cibej [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 3:31 AM
[...] > >Looks like a definition to me... Why doesn't this work? > > > > > Uh -- I said HEAD, not the 0.9 branch. Doh. >>> Since there's a whole bunch of atomics that do _not_ have a >>> Win32-specific implementation in apr_atomic.h, my guess is that we need >>> to build apr_atomic.c on Windows. Worth a shot. It looks generic enough. Sander
