On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, [UTF-8] Branko Ä^Libej wrote: > >>Huh, not surprising. apr_atomic.h does _not_ define apr_atomic_init on > >>Win32, Netware, FreeBSD, Linux, MVS and djgpp; no wonder there are > >>dangling references to it in apr_pools.obj. > > Uh -- I said HEAD, not the 0.9 branch.
As a data point, the test builds I ran earlier today where I caught the missing #include "apr_atomic.h" in apr_pools.c were run on Linux. After including that, the warning about having no definition of apr_atomic_init() went away, so it must be getting _something_. --Cliff