William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Dumb Q perhaps; for APR-UTIL 1.0 don't we want to change:
typedef struct apr_bucket apr_bucket; typedef struct apr_bucket_brigade apr_bucket_brigade_t; etc
to follow our convention:
typedef struct apr_bucket_t apr_bucket_t;
typedef struct apr_bucket_brigade_t apr_bucket_brigade_t;
etc...
+1 as long as we maintain (deprecated) typedefs for the old names for backward compatibility.
Brian
