On Tue, 7 Oct 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >>Dumb Q perhaps; for APR-UTIL 1.0 don't we want to change: > >> > >>typedef struct apr_bucket apr_bucket; > >>typedef struct apr_bucket_brigade apr_bucket_brigade_t; > >>etc > >> > >>to follow our convention: > >> > >>typedef struct apr_bucket_t apr_bucket_t; > >>typedef struct apr_bucket_brigade_t apr_bucket_brigade_t; > >>etc...
It just doesn't sound as nice. :-} It's also gonna be a bit of a headache for the guy who has to go back through and wrap things to 80 cols again, but oh well, whatever. --Cliff
