On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Mladen Turk wrote: > That was the bug. > > > if not returning whatever apr_thread_cond_timedwait() > > returned, why not return APR_TIMEUP instead of APR_EAGAIN? > > but like Cliff said I wonder why the retval of > > apr_thread_cond_timewait() isn't appropriate? > > The fixed patch uses the returning value from apr_thread_cond_timedwait(). > Also changed to apr_reslist_timeout_set.
Ah. K, cool. Thanks, Cliff
