At 04:51 PM 1/13/2004, Günter Knauf wrote: >do you still expect massive changes with APR 1.0 ?
I have the sense that folks want to see: * platform neutral apr_poll() that works on apr_file_t's as well, since so many daemons and other applications will require this. Non trivial - but we may just end up with a sleep(100 /*ms*/) poll test_files loop. Or we may have to use local socket pairs as the fallback daemon pipe mechanism. * completed documentation (Sander Temme has put in alot of effort at cleaning up the doxygen results, kudos!) I'm also feeling that running as-a-daemon should mostly be the effort of APR itself, so that the issues between normal daemons, Win32 services, and the odd unix dameon control environments are totally flattened out to be nearly platform-neutral. All that said, nothing should stop us from beginning 1.0-alphas (caviat: contents may settle during shipment) and getting some feedback on this front, too. But if these are rolled, I would really feel warmer and fuzzier with calling them APR 0.9.9, or something that will restrict them from ever being used with any app build for APR 1.0 release. Bill