Hi, > What ship? Did 2.1.0 actually go anywhere? Seems from the folks > complaining that they didn't feel we ever released it. correct - but I believe Justin meant APR 1.0 and not httpd... and with APR I've the same feeling than he: all those doing development fetch from CVS, and therefore they are on APR 1.0 and httpd-2.1-dev... so people have already started to rely on 1.0 version; I self patched mod_jk / mod_jk2 recently to work with APR 1.0, and others did probably with other 3rd party mods...
Guenter. > Proof is in the pudding - are we at 2.1.1-dev? > Bill > At 01:54 AM 1/16/2004, you wrote: >>--On Tuesday, January 13, 2004 5:28 PM -0600 "William A. Rowe, Jr." >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>front, too. But if these are rolled, I would really feel warmer and >>>fuzzier >>>with calling them APR 0.9.9, or something that will restrict them from >>>ever >>>being used with any app build for APR 1.0 release. >> >>FWIW, HEAD already produces APR 1.0.0. >> >>Not that I'm disagreeing, but that ship sailed a long time ago. -- justin
