Re: apr_shm_attach() and APR_EEXIST

[Amit Athavale]

Thanks for quick review.

Joe Orton wrote:

On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 05:08:17PM +0530, Amit Athavale wrote:
  

Here is initial patch:

- only for unix, if this OK I will write for other platforms
- Tested on linux RH 8.0 and solaris 9
- New test case added in testshm.c

Please review it so I can provide patch for other platforms ASAP.
    

Looks good, thanks a lot Amit... patch against APR HEAD would be
preferred though.  There's no need for apr_shm_remove() to have an
APR_ENOTIMPL case: the caller knows not to call this function for an
anonymous segment.

So should APR_SUCCESS be return type by default?