At 08:28 PM 6/3/2004, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 06:16:06PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: >> Because it has been empirically proven that "wait for X" does not work. >> Without a change in point-of-view, we'll never get it released. Thus, the >> "just ship the frickin' thing" is a way to break out of the deadlock. > >++1. 1.0 should not be held hostage because it's not perfect. -- justin
Nope, and nobody is suggesting it has to be perfect. What Ryan, Amit and I are asking for (and that most of the rest of the world who *doesn't* directly participate in apr/dev decisions) is that the API is right. We are in 95% better shape than a year ago. The few last warts are pretty easy fixes, just a round tuit that someone needs to crack. Stas posed a pretty straightforward question about APR finfo/file macros and has yet to get any answer. One peripheral question - does this mean we are suggesting that apr-util is also at 1.0? Just asking. Bill
