On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 05:00:52PM +0100, David Reid wrote:
> So, I fixed the incorrect tag and rerolled. The revised tarballs (correctly
> named to keep Joe happy this time) are being uploaded into the usual place,
> http://www.apache.org/~dreid/ as I write this.
I'm getting a segfault in testsockets on Solaris 9/Intel. No time to further
debug. Is anyone else seeing this? Best I can tell is that an earlier
test is failing and it's passing a NULL parameter on.
Here's the backtrace:
(dbx 1) run testsockets
Running: testall testsockets
(process id 12674)
testsockets : \signal SEGV (no mapping at the fault address) in
apr_socket_bind at line 131 in file "sockets.c"
131 (struct sockaddr *)&sa->sa, sa->salen) == -1) {
(dbx 2) where
current thread: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=>[1] apr_socket_bind(sock = 0x80fe478, sa = (nil)), line 131 in "sockets.c"
[2] sendto_receivefrom(tc = 0x8100d30, data = (nil)), line 141 in
"testsockets.c"
[3] abts_run_test(ts = 0x8100ca0, f = 0x805fac0 =
&`testall`testsockets.c`sendto_receivefrom(abts_case *tc, void *data), value =
(nil)), line 171 in "abts.c"
[4] testsockets(suite = 0x8100ca0), line 201 in "testsockets.c"
[5] main(argc = 2, argv = 0x8046954), line 409 in "abts.c"
HTH. -- justin
