At 04:55 PM 7/1/2004, Joe Orton wrote: >On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 11:45:44PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: >> Joe Orton wrote: >> >> >>I've noticed that the most recent CVS of 1.0.0 installs both >> >>/usr/bin/apr-config, and /usr/bin/apr-1-config. Is this intentional? >> >> >Yes, for the moment. >> >> How do you suggest the RPM should handle this? - at the moment >> installing a v0 RPM and a v1 RPM simultaneously will cause a conflict. >> Should we just leave it as is for now? > >Yes, just leave it for the moment I guess.
If we leave it, and side-by-side installs are broken, this does not seem like a good initial release point for 1.0 :( Bill
