On 11/1/05, André Malo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > +#define CLEANUP_CAST (apr_status_t (*)(void*))
>
> Hmm. That looks strange to me. Wouldn't a typedef (+ casts in place) serve
> better?

+1, I was actually thinking the same thing.

-garrett

Reply via email to