On Tuesday 01 November 2005 22:44, André Malo wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > +#define CLEANUP_CAST (apr_status_t (*)(void*))
>
> Hmm. That looks strange to me. Wouldn't a typedef (+ casts in place) serve
> better?

Huh?  It is a cast.  No more, no less.

-- 
Nick Kew

Reply via email to