Garrett Rooney wrote:
So you want gump to build a configuration that virtually no users actually use? That seems totally useless to me. Gump should be building and testing the system as it is intended to be used, if this was a win32 build, I'd be all for it testing apr-iconv, but it's a unix build, it should use the support for the platform iconv just like a normal user would.
Granted all modern Solaris/Linux build iconv into the clib or liconv as a system library; however users of older unicies or obscure platforms still could certainly require some iconv support. Once we dump iconv, if we ever did, then I'd agree with you. Bill
