On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 12:59:34AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > I would continue to veto any single line containing apr_memcache[...] in > httpd > so long as there isn't a trivial backend as part of apr-util that users can > deploy without obtaining, and installing, a memcached process. > By that reasoning, all ldap auth and mod_dbd should also be vetoed... and how about all dbm (except sdbm) - or have you already implemented minimal oracle, postgres and ldap servers in apr-util test/ ? And how about the distcache interface hacked directly into mod_ssl?
vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
