Mike Duigou wrote: > Would it be possible to get issue #40020 "Add support for apr_uint8_t > and apr_int8_t types" committed before this release? It's hopefully > uncontroversial. I've reposted my patch several times to the dev list > with no activity. The patch is also attached to the issue. > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40020
FYI - since the old stuff is an error, I'd have no issue picking up just the apr_byte_t bug fix, if you want to reduce to just that code for both APR 0.9 and 1.2. But what do others here think, if we have byte values >255 should we break the API of the broken builds as of the next subversion so that the size and alignment are correct? Bill
