We should verify this is or is not a problem on these platforms, but I have no way to verify. They both should have profited from my earlier efforts since both platforms include ../win32/filepath.c - but only running ./testall on those two platforms will confirm for certain.
Joe Orton wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:58:24PM -0500, William Rowe wrote: >> I've committed several bugfix changes to path handling for win32, and some >> other issues are also resolved. The APR_CHECK_FILE must die as well, since >> it may be at the root of many user reports of pthread-related synchronization >> and daemon control flukes on Solaris. >> >> Thinking of rolling 0.9/1.2 about next Friday, if that motivates anyone to >> mop up any other lose ends. > > The testnames tests are still failing on Unixes after your changes > there, I haven't had time to chase that up. Presuming that is harmless > everything else should be good on 1.2.x. Looks like I never committed > the license header changes to 0.9.x, hum. > > testnames : Line 103: expected <../../..>, but saw <../../../> > FAILED 1 of 14
