On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 08:12 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Please review and vote on those you have time to - reply once or four times, > just review those you can as you can; http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ > > +1/-1 Release > [+1] apr-1.2.10 > [+1] apr-util-1.2.9 > [+1] apr-0.9.15 > [+1] apr-util-0.9.14
Fedora 7, i686 and x86_64, all tests passed. CentOS 5, i686 and x86_64, all tests passed, as root user. RHEL 4, i686, all tests passed, as root user. CentOS 4, x86_64, all tests passed. Note that with CentOS 5 (x86_64) and RHEL 4 (i686), apr-1.2.10, testuser fails when run as an unprivileged user (this is from CentOS 5 box): ----------------------------------------- testuser : //bin/sh: line 1: 31277 Segmentation fault ./$prog make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/users/bsmojver/a/apr-1.2.10/test' ----------------------------------------- dmesg has: ----------------------------------------- testall[30507]: segfault at 0000000000000000 rip 00002aaaaaf75615 rsp 00007fff5a82bde0 error 4 ----------------------------------------- Joe, can you see the same? My CFLAGS were "-O2 -Wall -g" and I also have LDAP authentication configured (OpenLDAP). I kind of remember bumping into something similar before, but the details escape me... Fedora 7 and CentOS 4 x86_64 didn't have LDAP authentication configured. I'm guessing this has something to do with tests passing with an unprivileged user account. PS. DBD tests don't actually run in apr-util, as they need at least one parameter (driver) to go ahead. Something we need to fix in test/Makefile.in. PPS. Tests on apr-util-0.9.14 require a key press mid way through, after this: Yes 1861249389000000 Sun, 24 Dec 2028 05:43:09 GMT Yes 56482372000000 Sat, 16 Oct 1971 17:32:52 GMT Yes 1219606855000000 Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:40:55 GMT Did anyone else experience this and if yes, is this intended? Aren't the tests supposed to be unattended? -- Bojan
