On 11/19/2007 12:38 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> Please provide your input to release. >> >> [+1] APR-0.9.17 >> [+1] APR-1.2.12 >> [-1] APR-util-1.2.11 >> [ ] APR-iconv-1.2.1 > > Fedora 8, i686 and x86_64. > > Both apr-0.9.17 and apr-1.2.12 fail SHM tests: > > 0.9.17: > ------------------------- > starting consumer..... > starting producer..... > Name-based shared memory test FAILED: [2] No such file or directory > Name-based shared memory test FAILED: [2] No such file or directory
That's a bug in the test. Just ensure that the test subdirectory is in your PATH such that testshmconsumer and testshmcontributor can be executed. > Waiting for producer to exit. > Waiting for consumer to exit. > Destroying shared memory segment...OK > Named shared memory test passed! > ------------------------- > > 1.2.12: > ------------------------- > testshm : FAILED 1 of 6 > ------------------------- > > However, there have been comments that this is supposed to be expected > and that there is no fix available at present. So, I guess +1 in that > case. > > apr-util-1.2.11 fails with: > ------------------------- > testdate : FAILED 1 of 2 > ------------------------- > > Also, testreslist hangs, just like for some other people. > > Given that Ruediger already committed patches for both of these, it > would probably be best to roll again. I haven't commited for testdate so far. I just wanted to hear some other opinions especially on the patches to apr_date_parse_rfc as I couldn't believe that these bugs have not been found in a function that has not been touched for such a long time. So please comment and I commit or adjust. Regards RĂ¼diger