On 11/19/2007 12:38 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-15 at 16:26 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> Please provide your input to release.
>>
>>    [+1] APR-0.9.17
>>    [+1] APR-1.2.12
>>    [-1] APR-util-1.2.11
>>    [  ] APR-iconv-1.2.1
> 
> Fedora 8, i686 and x86_64.
> 
> Both apr-0.9.17 and apr-1.2.12 fail SHM tests:
> 
> 0.9.17:
> -------------------------
> starting consumer.....
> starting producer.....
> Name-based shared memory test FAILED: [2] No such file or directory 
> Name-based shared memory test FAILED: [2] No such file or directory 

That's a bug in the test. Just ensure that the test subdirectory is in your PATH
such that testshmconsumer and testshmcontributor can be executed.

> Waiting for producer to exit.
> Waiting for consumer to exit.
> Destroying shared memory segment...OK
> Named shared memory test passed!
> -------------------------
> 
> 1.2.12:
> -------------------------
> testshm             : FAILED 1 of 6
> -------------------------
> 
> However, there have been comments that this is supposed to be expected
> and that there is no fix available at present. So, I guess +1 in that
> case.
> 
> apr-util-1.2.11 fails with:
> -------------------------
> testdate            : FAILED 1 of 2
> -------------------------
> 
> Also, testreslist hangs, just like for some other people.
> 
> Given that Ruediger already committed patches for both of these, it
> would probably be best to roll again.

I haven't commited for testdate so far. I just wanted to hear some other 
opinions
especially on the patches to apr_date_parse_rfc as I couldn't believe that these
bugs have not been found in a function that has not been touched for such a 
long time.
So please comment and I commit or adjust.

Regards

RĂ¼diger


Reply via email to