On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 04:18:32PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On May 1, 2008, at 3:33 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > >Christopher Key wrote: > >>> > >>I'm not sure whether this has been covered already, and whether it > >>needs to go in during a major release, but is there any chance of > >>adding apr_int8_t and apr_uint8_t typedefs? > > Why? The type char is defined by the C standard to be an 8bit signed > integer.
Huh? 'char' may or may not be signed, the spec doesn't specify which, except for the condition that if a "real" character is stored in 'char' then that value is unsigned. But if I store, for example, 0xfb in there, (and 0xfb isn't a "real" character), then whether the value of that char is positive or negative (and thus, whether signed) is impl dependent. The 'signed' qualifier is redundant for all types except 'char' -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war" ~ John Adams
