Bill, Sorry for late reply, I have been overwhelmed by JavaOne preparation. I had reviewed the patch and gave my +1, just that I don't have comitter access and won't be able to help. There is the other Solaris poll bug fix I tried to get it in but no one seems to care even though Paul had say it should be committed.
I am getting frustrated with APR, to be honest. Cheers, Henry On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:36 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42889 > > > > which must be committed? > > > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20540 > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20542 > > > > I'm a little disturbed that the 1.3.0 discussion has been going on for > > about 2.5 weeks, and I just now noticed this flaw. Once 1.3 is gone > > we can't *fix* the api, and can't expand it until 1.4 > > > > More on the topic; > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43876 > > containing threadpool API patches here; > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21378 > > without any closing feedback to Joe Mudd, submitter. > > The httpd project has a goal to tag on the 7th. Work backwards, that's > a tag here no later than the 4th. I would hate to pull apr_threadpool, > but if it can't be addressed today or tomorrow and some final decisions > made on it's initial rollout, I'm tempted that we simply push it to 1.4.0, > which would be a shame. > > Bill >
