On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Henry Jen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bill, > > Sorry for late reply, I have been overwhelmed by JavaOne preparation. > I had reviewed the patch and gave my +1, just that I don't have comitter > access and won't be able to help. There is the other Solaris poll bug fix I > tried to get it in but no one seems to care even though Paul had say it > should be committed. >
One suggested me to point out the Solaris poll patch and Paul's comment, and hopefully one dear comitter would take action. The patch is attached to the issue: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43000 Patch is here: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21136 Mails archive related: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/200804.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/200712.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Henry > I am getting frustrated with APR, to be honest. > > Cheers, > Henry > > > > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:36 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42889 > > > > > > which must be committed? > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20540 > > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20542 > > > > > > I'm a little disturbed that the 1.3.0 discussion has been going on for > > > about 2.5 weeks, and I just now noticed this flaw. Once 1.3 is gone > > > we can't *fix* the api, and can't expand it until 1.4 > > > > > > > More on the topic; > > > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43876 > > > > containing threadpool API patches here; > > > > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21378 > > > > without any closing feedback to Joe Mudd, submitter. > > > > The httpd project has a goal to tag on the 7th. Work backwards, that's > > a tag here no later than the 4th. I would hate to pull apr_threadpool, > > but if it can't be addressed today or tomorrow and some final decisions > > made on it's initial rollout, I'm tempted that we simply push it to > > 1.4.0, > > which would be a shame. > > > > Bill > > > >
