On Tue, 13 May 2008 10:00:00 -0500 "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dynamic building will be a tremendous aid to anyone > > wanting to support multiple LDAP libraries, too. > > We have some open bugs concerning LDAP that could easily > > be down to static linking and less-than-100%-compatible > > library versions. > > My plan was a 1:1 to a specific provider, since this would break > expectations. I'd agree with Joe that providing multiple LDAP > back-ends would end up being a 2.0 feature :( Um, I wasn't thinking of multiple simultaneous backends. Rather that switching (the single) backend would not require rebuilding the whole of apr-util. -- Nick Kew Application Development with Apache - the Apache Modules Book http://www.apachetutor.org/
