Nick Kew wrote:
Um, I wasn't thinking of multiple simultaneous backends. Rather that switching (the single) backend would not require rebuilding the whole of apr-util.
Sadly it does for "classic" ldap users because of the transparency we offered them in choosing their behavior and API. Of course, splitting this properly will let us normalize all of this at the APR level, eventually reaching parity and letting us drop in a replacement. I'm afraid that might be a ways off, though.
