On Nov 12, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Paul Querna wrote: > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Jim Jagielski <[email protected]> wrote: >> Tag as what? Alpha? Beta? GA?? :) > > APR doesn't have those versioning concepts AFAIK.
*grin* That was the point, I think. I don't anyone thinks that either are quite GA level yet, which implies some other tagging convention. > > If we released a 2.0.0, we couldn't break anything until 3.x. > >> On Nov 11, 2009, at 6:38 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> >>> If nobody objects, I'll plan to tag 1.4.0 this coming Monday 11/16 >>> (it so happens to be after all my deadlines and right before more >>> work obligations, so there a hole right there to fill). Should give >>> anyone sufficient time to wrap up their inspection of the API and >>> code changes. >>> >>> If nobody objects, I'll plan to tag 2.0.0 on 12/21 (during the start >>> of my holidays) - which adds 4+ weeks beyond the close of a 1.4.0 >>> vote during which time folks are free to fix broken API declarations, >>> drop deprecated interfaces, rename wonky function names and generally >>> just make-ready for a GA. >>> >>> So if there are objections, please quick raise/fix these so we can be >>> moving on at svn, httpd and elsewhere :) >>> >>> Bill >>> >> >> >
