On Nov 12, 2009, at 2:27 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > My point w.r.t. your suggestion earlier (and note Paul and I didn't > do this) is to say 'ok, code freeze for a month until I tag'.
Huh? trying to figure out where this was said. Pointers welcome :) > > >> If the intent is to tag so we have a common ground in which to >> determine readiness, then that wasn't clear and I'm all +1 on that. > > Yes, the tag suggested at httpd would be to see 'how close', and > could have happened the day you posted your intent to T&R httpd. And > that is exactly the tag Paul created last week on a few days notice. > So what? The fact that Paul just went ahead and did it compared to my announced intent with more advanced notice means not a thing as far as I'm concerned. I knew when I suggested that I would not have the cycles required to be an active RM until some things got ironed out. See, I try to (1) involve people and (2) do stuff when I know I can follow thru... But even so, I wanted to get a test release out for people to use and give feedback on. Kudos to Paul for having the time to do it and I support that 100%.
