On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 1:58 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > Jeff Trawick wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Joe Orton <jor...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> Snapshots of the APR and APR-util 1.4.x trees have been distributed by >>> as part of the httpd 2.3.4 alpha release. Should the APR project treat >>> those snapshots as "releases" for versioning purposes? In other words, >>> should we ensure future APR/APR-util releases maintain source and binary >>> backwards compatibility with those snapshots as required by the >>> versioning guidelines, http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html? >>> >>> Please vote: >>> >>> [ ] Yes >> >> [X] No > > You cannot ethically vote to release ASF software at one project and > declare it not-released at another project. That slight of hand renders > your vote invalid.
We disagree on whether or not the httpd 2.3.4 prereqs tarball constitutes an APR release. Leave it at that. It is not helpful in any way to refer to my vote as unethical or as a slight of hand.
