On 2/19/2010 5:48 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote: >> nice-to-haves: >> Win32 source flavor of release tarballs, for both 1.4.2 and 1.3.12 > > I guess I'm waiting for Bill to say "go ahead without them" or "I'm > trying to get caught up".
All of the above(!) >> see site updates in attachment (generated html not included) >> >> basic theme is that 1.4.2-is-the-best-apr but acknowledge 1.3.12 as a >> bug fix release for the 1.3 series >> >> AFAICT apr 1.3.9/apr-util-1.3.9 were the last releases with security fixes > > Can anyone ACK the following? > Update the 1.4 announcement to indicate that 1.3.12 is being released > at the same time. > Remove the 1.3 announcement. > (Eventually) Send the 1.4 announcement to [email protected] & > [email protected]. Suggestion that I started locally in-tree when you first pointed this out; We rename the file to APR-Announce-1.x.txt - within, it heralds 1.4.2 has been released with a corresponding 1.3.9 security release. But with the rename, it makes perfect sense for apr-util to be 1.3 while apr is at 1.4 :)
