On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:38 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote: > On 2/19/2010 5:48 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> nice-to-haves: >>> Win32 source flavor of release tarballs, for both 1.4.2 and 1.3.12 >> >> I guess I'm waiting for Bill to say "go ahead without them" or "I'm >> trying to get caught up". > > All of the above(!) > >>> see site updates in attachment (generated html not included) >>> >>> basic theme is that 1.4.2-is-the-best-apr but acknowledge 1.3.12 as a >>> bug fix release for the 1.3 series >>> >>> AFAICT apr 1.3.9/apr-util-1.3.9 were the last releases with security fixes >> >> Can anyone ACK the following? > >> Update the 1.4 announcement to indicate that 1.3.12 is being released >> at the same time. >> Remove the 1.3 announcement. >> (Eventually) Send the 1.4 announcement to dev@apr.apache.org & >> annou...@apache.org. > > Suggestion that I started locally in-tree when you first pointed this out; > > We rename the file to APR-Announce-1.x.txt - within, it heralds 1.4.2 has > been released with a corresponding 1.3.9 security release. But with the > rename, it makes perfect sense for apr-util to be 1.3 while apr is at 1.4 :)
That's a good solution. I can work that path if you didn't get far, or simply step aside, or XXX.
