On 05.04.2012 00:38, Greg Stein wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 18:09, Graham Leggett <[email protected]> wrote: >> ... >> This type of comment embarrasses both the project and the ASF. If you want >> to discuss an issue, please discuss the issue. As soon as emails start >> getting abusive, EOT. > I did discuss the issue. And then you went off about CHANGES, which > I'd already accepted and moved on from. Now you're moving on to > discussing three words in my reply. > > How about sticking to the original: do not mix backports and edits. > I've said that many times, and you continue to change the topic to > inane things. So yeah, all I hear is "blah blah blah". And yes, I can > also use swear words in there, too "blah fucking blah". What's the big > deal? There are no ad hominem attacks or anything else going on. > > So get a grip, and don't worry about a little swearing. How about > doing backports properly instead?
Um, Greg? I often find that rereading evening mails in the morning before sending them is conductive to a civilized discussion. This has gone way beyond necessary. -- Brane
