On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> confirm test fails on solaris/amd64 too >> > > Unless I've missed something, no one has tested on Windows yet. I'll try > to test that in the next few hours to see if there is anything else obvious > to fix before tagging 1.4.8. > 1.4.7 built/tested with MinGW shows no regressions from 1.4.6: Failed Tests Total Fail Failed % =================================================== testdso 5 4 80.00% testmmap 8 3 37.50% testshm 5 2 40.00% testshm passes when run as administrator. IIRC, testdso doesn't work from MinGW until 1.5, and testmmap has a line ending glitch when you build from .tar.*z -- some Windows code in the test program expects CRLF in a data file. With a Visual Studio 2010 build, testsock is failing inconsistently. (no fail, line 234, line 165, now I can't see a failure again ... ) Isn't this the sort of issue Rainer reported in the past? It *seems* that Windows has no regressions that are exposed by the APR test suite, but to be more certain I'd need to bang on testsock a lot harder with different versions/builds. > >> >> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 3:12 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I've got an issue AIX where the test added prior to >> >> >> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1309386 >> >> >> >> Works before r1309386 but not after (EINVAL). Will look further this >> evening >> > >> > It seems like AIX, Solaris, HP, and Apple are in the byte/char camp >> > >> > Linux says integer. >> > >> > (This is strictly for the IPv4 flavors) >> > >> > Mladen -- do you recall if the 4 byte change for ipv4 was needed and >> where? >> >> >> >> -- >> Eric Covener >> cove...@gmail.com >> > > > > -- > Born in Roswell... married an alien... > http://emptyhammock.com/ > -- Born in Roswell... married an alien... http://emptyhammock.com/
