On 06.05.2013 16:28, Jeff Trawick wrote: > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 6:49 AM, Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com > <mailto:traw...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Eric Covener <cove...@gmail.com > <mailto:cove...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > confirm test fails on solaris/amd64 too > > > Unless I've missed something, no one has tested on Windows yet. > I'll try to test that in the next few hours to see if there is > anything else obvious to fix before tagging 1.4.8. > > > 1.4.7 built/tested with MinGW shows no regressions from 1.4.6: > > Failed Tests Total Fail Failed % > =================================================== > testdso 5 4 80.00% > testmmap 8 3 37.50% > testshm 5 2 40.00% > > testshm passes when run as administrator. IIRC, testdso doesn't work > from MinGW until 1.5, and testmmap has a line ending glitch when you > build from .tar.*z -- some Windows code in the test program expects CRLF > in a data file. > > With a Visual Studio 2010 build, testsock is failing inconsistently. > (no fail, line 234, line 165, now I can't see a failure again ... ) > Isn't this the sort of issue Rainer reported in the past?
At least I don't remember having seen non reproducable failures for testsock and didn't report for 1.4.3-1.4.7 (the releases I voted on). The only failures I get are for testsockets on Solaris but that's an IPv6 issues that's not new. > It *seems* that Windows has no regressions that are exposed by the APR > test suite, but to be more certain I'd need to bang on testsock a lot > harder with different versions/builds. Regards, Rainer
