On 06 Jun 2013, at 5:24 PM, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote:

> It makes sense to have it once we have changes that someone wants to release 
> in 1.x but which can't be released in 1.5.x.  (I guess you already have such 
> changes in mind so go for it ;) )

Indeed I have :)

> As we've had some trouble in the past keeping such next-1.x branches up to 
> date (mostly minor stuff like doxygen improvements that skipped 1.latest), I 
> think it is best to defer until actual use. 

I am ready to backport http://svn.apache.org/r1489517, 
http://svn.apache.org/r1489520 and http://svn.apache.org/r1490248, but have 
nowhere to backport it to.

Regards,
Graham
--


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to