On Thursday 06 June 2013, Graham Leggett wrote: > On 06 Jun 2013, at 5:24 PM, Jeff Trawick <[email protected]> wrote: > > It makes sense to have it once we have changes that someone wants > > to release in 1.x but which can't be released in 1.5.x. (I > > guess you already have such changes in mind so go for it ;) ) > > Indeed I have :) > > > As we've had some trouble in the past keeping such next-1.x > > branches up to date (mostly minor stuff like doxygen > > improvements that skipped 1.latest), I think it is best to defer > > until actual use. > > I am ready to backport http://svn.apache.org/r1489517, > http://svn.apache.org/r1489520 and http://svn.apache.org/r1490248, > but have nowhere to backport it to.
I am also in favor of waiting with the branching until there is some momentum to release 1.6.0. Backporting stuff to multiple branches is annoying. Maybe put a 'waiting for apr-util 1.6' section into trunk STATUS with the list of revisions?
