On 02 Nov 2016, at 2:20 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > OK, so my plan is to start pulling the relevant bits out of Credis for > use in apr_redis. I was thinking initially about maybe just using the > library, but for parity w/ apr_memcache, that doesn't make sense. > > Here's the rub: I'd prefer not having to do both the 1.6 and 2.0 > "ports" at the same time; instead I'd like to implement 1st in 1.6 > and then, once it gets the green light front-port it to 2.0. The > issue, of course, is that 1.6 still has apr and apr-util. > > Any concerns about this approach? Or would people prefer it be > added 1st to 2.0/trunk and then folded into 1.6...
I’m imagining that it’s easier to work with apr-util v1.6 + httpd than apr v2.0 + httpd? If so it makes sense. Can’t release v1.6.x until it’s also in v2.0 though, but that shouldn’t be too much of a problem. Regards, Graham —
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
