APR is C-T-R. If it is larger or significant change/addition, discussion on list first is great, but most of APR has been JDI.
As 1.6 is unreleased, whatever goes in trunk that does -not- break backwards binary compat can go right into 1.6 as well. So go for it, don't worry about STATUS unless the proposal is under debate/discussion. On Dec 17, 2016 10:23 AM, "Ivan Zhakov" <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > On 17 December 2016 at 10:56, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> > wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 1:43 AM, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 24 August 2016 at 20:34, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: > >> > I was monitoring Subversion server I/O on Windows and noticed that > >> > apr_file_info_get(APR_FINFO_SIZE) involves two syscalls > >> > (QueryInformationVolume and QueryAllInformationFile). The > >> > apr_file_info_get(APR_FINFO_SIZE) is actively used by Subversion > >> > filesystem and optimizing it gives around 5-10% IO reduction. > >> > > >> > Attached patch adds optimized codepath to apr_file_info_get() when > >> > only APR_FINFO_SIZE is requested. > >> > > >> Committed in r1774712. > > > > > > Suggest you might want to backport to the 1.6.x soon-to-be branch. > Thanks. Should I just backport it to 1.6.x branch or it should be > nominated to branches/1.6.x/STATUS? > > > -- > Ivan Zhakov >
