> On 19 Jan 2017, at 18:44, Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org> wrote: > > On 19 Jan 2017, at 18:40, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org > <mailto:br...@apache.org>> wrote: >> On 19.01.2017 18:30, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: >>> On 19 Jan 2017, at 17:46, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net >>> <mailto:wr...@rowe-clan.net>> wrote: >>> >>>> In 2.0 I'd like to see include/apu_error.h simply a stub to #include >>>> <apr_errno.h> >>>> and track it all in one place. Will try to hold onto that though for >>>> my next round tuit. >>>> >>>> It makes the back porting of new apu_errno.h constants a bit trickier but >>>> hardly >>>> impossible. >>>> >>>> ITMT, your proposal looks fine Dirk. >>> Ok - what is the best way to get things like this in - shall I simply send >>> them as unified diff into http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/ >>> <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/>. >>> >>> Or better to post them here for a more coherent picture. >>> >>> As I suspect I have a few more — the world of crypto and hash-ing seems to >>> have a few small loose ends like this. >> >> You're an APR committer. Just commit it. > > Am I ? Ok - will try !
Blush - you were totally correct. I simply did not spot an http(s) error - and assumed I had no access. Thanks all (and Daniel Gruno for spotting it in 1 second!) Dw.
