On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote:
> As noted in a previous thread regarding the values of timeouts
> related to the 3 major timedwait() canon implementations, I'm not
> exactly sure how well thought out and tested these are. Putting
> them in 1.6 means that people will start using them, and we could
> discover brokenness after the fact, and end-users will need to
> work around that brokenness while waiting on the next APR patch
> release...

Linux is sysv by default. Windows are native (using native API).

Reply via email to